View source for Conflicting legal issues

*There are Conflicts
**legal and legislative
***law enforcement experience, particularly with regard to cybercrime - which has increased 300% since 2011.
***the rights to privacy are not absolute
**Other human rights
***the potential need for standards to support a “balance of human rights”.
**Legal changes
**National security requirements
**The problem of ever present sensors ( IoT etc)
*Conflicts can be avoided
**Man examples are information security problems and not in it self privacy problems.
**If we knowingly introduce backdoors into systems then we will have no security.
**There are technologies to handle this type of situations in many cases
**a subject can use lawyer, written statement, blockchain / smart contract, etc. whatever to reflect his / her will to implement the privacy rights – whether the implementation happens before or after the death
*SC27 WG5 should take a much wider look at this important issue, perhaps conducting a landscape review similar to the identity-related landscape review
*Privacy depends on strong governance and AAA (Authentication, Authorisation and Accountability) as any cyber professional will agree, which means privacy needs to be linked more closely to WG5’s authentication & IDM work. We need to consider the “How” of privacy more effectively, if we want our WG5 standards to be useful and widely adopted.