Difference between revisions of "CEN TC225 Activities"

From IPEN Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "File:CEN CENELEC.jpgFile:ETSI.jpg == <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;">JWG8 on Privacy Management of Security Products and Related Services</span> ==...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:CEN CENELEC.jpg]][[File:ETSI.jpg]]
http://ipen.trialog.com/images/ipen/c/c0/CEN_CENELEC.jpg<span style="line-height: 20.7999992370605px;"></span>
== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;"></span> ==


== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;">JWG8 on Privacy Management of Security Products and Related Services</span> ==
== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;"></span> ==
 
== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;"></span> ==
 
== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;">CEN/TC225 - AIDC technologies</span> ==


{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="width: 900px;"
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="width: 900px;"
Line 7: Line 12:
| Context
| Context
|  
|  
The European commission has issued in early 2015 a mandate to European Standardisation Organisations (or ESOs), CEN, CENELEC, ETSI) to work on a roadmap of standards covering the privacy management of security products and related services
In December 2008, the European Commission addressed the Mandate M/436 to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in the field of ICT as applied to RFID systems.&nbsp;The Mandate M/436 was accepted by the ESOs in the first months of 2009. The Mandate addresses the data protection, privacy and information aspects of RFID, and is being executed in two phases.
 
Phase 1, completed in May 2011, identified the work needed to produce a complete framework of future RFID standards. The Phase 1 results are contained in the ETSI Technical Report [http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/187000_187099/187020/01.01.01_60/tr_187020v010101p.pdf TR 187 020], which was published in May 2011.
 
Phase 2 is concerned with the execution of the standardisation work programme identified in the first phase. This second phase ended in July 2014 with the publication of different technical reports and the publication of two European standards:


<span style="line-height: 1.6;">Consequently, CEN/CENELEC has decided to launch a joint working group JWG8, the secretariat of which will be managed by AFNOR (France).</span>
[http://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:38577&cs=1201C63DE7F80DEAB30AE7D3BD4035F0A EN 16571]: « Information technology - RFID privacy impact assessment process» and


The objective if to define a roadmap and work plan for October 2015
[http://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:110:0::::FSP_PROJECT:38350&cs=117C4B4C6C024833E3B87802F882742D0 EN 16570]: « Information technology - Notification of RFID - The information sign and additional information to be provided by operators of RFID application systems».


|-
|-
| URL
| URL
|  
|  
Mandate page:&nbsp;[http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/mandates/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.detail&id=548 http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/mandates/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.detail&id=548]
Mandate page: [http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/mandates/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.detail&id=415 M/436]


JWG8 page:&nbsp;[http://www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Sectors/DefenceSecurityPrivacy/Privacy/Pages/default.aspx http://www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Sectors/DefenceSecurityPrivacy/Privacy/Pages/default.aspx]
CEN/TC225 page: [http://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_LANG_ID,FSP_ORG_ID:25,6206&cs=1655B872A8BB9229C9ABA80AB8819C24A#1 CEN/TC225]


|-
|-
| Members of JWG8
| Members of CEN/TC225
|  
|  
Working group structure
A dedicated Project Team has been appointed to draft the EN 16571 on PIA for RFID applications
<ul style="line-height: 18.9090900421143px;">
<ul style="line-height: 18.9090900421143px;">
<li>Chair: Claire Waast-Richards (EDF)</li>
<li>Project Leader: Claude Tételin ([http://www.centrenational-rfid.com/index_gb.cfm French RFID National Centre])</li>
</ul>
</ul>


Editing team
Editing team
<ul style="line-height: 18.9090900421143px;">
<ul style="line-height: 18.9090900421143px;">
<li>French delegation: Antonio Kung, Mourad Faher, Denis Pinkas</li>
<li>Paul Chartier ([https://www.convergent-software.co.uk/ Convergent Software Limited], UK), editor</li>
<li>German delegation: Matthias Reinis, Kai Rannenberg</li>
<li>XXX to be complted</li>
<li>UK delegation: Alan Shipman, John Mitchell</li>
<li></li>
<li>ANEC: Matthias Pocs</li>
<li>CEN-CENELEC: Alina Iatan</li>
</ul>
</ul>



Revision as of 16:01, 29 June 2015

http://ipen.trialog.com/images/ipen/c/c0/CEN_CENELEC.jpg

CEN/TC225 - AIDC technologies

Context

In December 2008, the European Commission addressed the Mandate M/436 to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in the field of ICT as applied to RFID systems. The Mandate M/436 was accepted by the ESOs in the first months of 2009. The Mandate addresses the data protection, privacy and information aspects of RFID, and is being executed in two phases.

Phase 1, completed in May 2011, identified the work needed to produce a complete framework of future RFID standards. The Phase 1 results are contained in the ETSI Technical Report TR 187 020, which was published in May 2011.

Phase 2 is concerned with the execution of the standardisation work programme identified in the first phase. This second phase ended in July 2014 with the publication of different technical reports and the publication of two European standards:

EN 16571: « Information technology - RFID privacy impact assessment process» and

EN 16570: « Information technology - Notification of RFID - The information sign and additional information to be provided by operators of RFID application systems».

URL

Mandate page: M/436

CEN/TC225 page: CEN/TC225

Members of CEN/TC225

A dedicated Project Team has been appointed to draft the EN 16571 on PIA for RFID applications

Editing team

Comments

[Antonio Kung]

  • During the IPEN workshop it was made clear that the concept of security products should be more clearly defined (in particular on the contradiction between surveillance and privacy)