Difference between revisions of "ISO"
Line 717: | Line 717: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
=== <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;">PII Protection considerations for smartphone app providers (Started in October 2015. Completed)</span> === | === <span style="font-size: larger; line-height: 1.2;">PII Protection considerations for smartphone app providers (Started in October 2015. Completed in April 2017)</span> === | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="line-height: 20.7999992370605px; width: 900px;" | {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="line-height: 20.7999992370605px; width: 900px;" |
Revision as of 22:02, 4 March 2018
Introduction
The objective of this page is to provide a high-level view of activities related to privacy standards in ISO, in particular in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC27
More info can be found on in the SC27 portal:
- http://www.jtc1sc27.din.de/cmd?level=tpl-home&languageid=en
- http://www.jtc1sc27.din.de/cmd?level=tpl-bereich&menuid=220707&languageid=en&cmsareaid=220707 (set of slides)
Note that the portal will in general contain more information that in this wiki, which focuses mainly on work carried out in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC27/WG5.The convenor is Kai Rannenberg, and the vice convenor is Jan Schallaböck.
WG5 regularly publishes a document a standing document (SG1) on WG5 roadmap. It can be found in [1]
Some conventions on ISO standards
The important things to know concerning ISO standards steps:
Standard |
|
Technical report |
|
Technical specification |
|
Progress is finalised in plenary meetings (taking place every 6 months). Here is a list of meetings that took place or that will take place.
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
Standards and Projects
19608 TS Guidance for developing security and privacy functional requirements based on 15408
Editor |
Naruki Kai |
Scope |
This Technical Report provides guidance for:
|
Documentation | |
Calendar | has been moved from TR to TS |
Comments |
20547 IS Big data reference architecture - Part 4 - Security and privacy
Editor | Jinhua Min, Xuebin Zhou |
ScopeS | Specifies security and privacy aspects of the big data reference architecture including governance, collection, processing, exchange, storage and identification |
Documentation |
Is the follow-up of the NIST initiative for a big data interoperability framework. Reports are available there: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] |
Calendar |
First WD and annotated table of content provided in november 2016 2nd WD provided in May 2017 3rd WD to be provided |
Comments |
WG9 is working on the following
Part 4 is transferred to SC27 for development, with close liaison with WG 9 [Antonio Kung] The 20547 reference architecture should be instantiated into domain specific real architectures (e.g. health, transport, energy...). 20547-4 should therefore
Further to Berlin meeting, decision to change title (term fabric is removed) |
20889 IS Privacy enhancing de-identification techniques
Editor |
Chris Mitchell and Lionel Vodzislawsky |
Scope | This international standard provides a description of privacy enhancing data de-identification techniques, to be used for describing and designing de-identification measures in accordance with the privacy principles in ISO/IEC 29100. In particular, this International Standard specifies terminology, a classification of de-identification techniques according to their characteristics, and their applicability for minimizing the risk of re-identification |
Documentation | Slides presented by Chris Mitchel during IPEN workshop (June 5th 2015): http://ipen.trialog.com/wiki/File:CM_slide_for_150605.pdf |
Calendar | Further to Berlin, will for DIS |
Comments |
27018 IS Code of practice for protection of PII in public clouds acting as PII processors
Editor |
|
Scope |
This International Standard establishes control objectives, controls and guidelines for implementing measures to protect Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in accordance with the privacy principles in ISO/IEC 29100 for the public cloud computing environment. It specifies guidelines based on ISO/IEC 27002, taking into consideration the regulatory requirements for the protection of PII which might be applicable within the context of the information security risk environment(s) of a provider of public cloud services. The standard concerns public cloud only and cloud service providers acting as PII processors. |
Documentation | Must be purchased. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61498 (preview available) |
Comments |
1st published in 2014 ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee SC 27, IT Security techniques |
27030 Security and Privacy for the Internet of Things
Editor |
To be nominated |
Scope |
This document provides guidelines on risks, principles and controls for security and privacy of Internet of Things (IoT). |
Documentation | |
Calendar | Will start in April 2018 |
Comments |
Follow up of
|
27550 TR Privacy engineering
Editor |
Antonio Kung, Mathias Reinis |
Scope |
This technical report provides privacy engineering guidelines that are intended to help organisations integrate recent advances in privacy engineering into their engineering practices:
The intended audience includes engineers and practitioners who are involved in the development, implementation or operation of systems that need privacy consideration, as well as managers in organisations responsible for privacy, development, product management, marketing, and operations |
Documentation | |
Calendar |
1st WD provided in January 2017 2nd WD provided in June 2017 1st PDTR under ballot |
Comments |
[Antonio Kung]
|
27551 IS Requirements for attribute-based unlinkable entity authentication
Editor |
Nat Sakimura, Jaehoon Na, Pascal Pailler |
Scope |
This International Standard
This International Standard is applicable to any information system that performs attribute-based unlinkable entity authentication |
Documentation | |
Calendar |
1st WD provided in April 2017 2nd WD provided in June 2017 |
Comments |
27552 IS Extension to ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for privacy management - Requirements and guidelines
Editor |
Alan Shipman, Angelika Eksteen, Srinivas Poosarla, Heung Youl Youm |
Scope |
This document specifies requirements and provides guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) in the form of an extension to ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for privacy management within the context of the organization. In particular, this document specifies PIMS-related requirements and provides guidance for PII controllers and PII processors holding responsibility and accountability for PII processing. This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations, which are PII controllers and/or PII processors processing PII within an ISMS. Excluding any of the requirements specified in clause 5 of this document is not acceptable when an organization claims conformity to this document. |
Documentation | |
Calendar |
1st WD provided in April 2017 2nd WD provided in June 2017 Intention is to go for 1st CD to be discussed in April 2018 |
Comments |
|
27570 Proposal Privacy Guidelines for Smart Cities
Editor |
To be nominated |
Scope |
The document takes into account a multiple agency as well as a citizen centric viewpoint, and provides guidance on how privacy standards can be used at a global level and at an organisational level for the benefit of citizens This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities, and not-for-profit organizations, that provides service in the smart city environments |
Documentation | |
Calendar | Will start in April 2018 |
Comments |
Follow up of SP Privacy in Smart cities |
29100 IS Privacy framework
Editor |
Stefan Weiss Revision : Nat Sakimura |
Scope | This International Standard provides a framework for defining privacy control requirements related to personally identifiable information within an information and communication technology environment.This International Standard is designed for those individuals who are involved in specifying, procuring, architecting, designing, developing, testing, administering and operating ICT systems. |
Documentation | Is a free standard : see http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html |
Comments |
In the Tampa meeting, a recommendation was made to go for a review (see below study period) A number of limited modifications have been identified in the Abu Dhabi that will lead to an amendment work The amended version will be available further to the Berlin meeting |
29101 IS Privacy architecture framework
Editor |
Stefan Weiss and Dan Bogdanov, For revision: Nat Sakimura, Shinsaku Kiyomote |
Scope |
This International Standard describes a privacy architecture framework that
This International Standard is applicable to entities involved in specifying, procuring, architecting, designing, testing, maintaining, administering and operating ICT systems that process PII. It focuses primarily on ICT systems that are designed to interact with PII principals. |
Documentation | Must be purchased. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45124 (preview available) |
Comments | Revision initiated in Berlin (November 2017) |
29134 IS Privacy impact assessment -- Methodology Privacy impact assessment - Guidelines
Editor | Mathias Reinis |
Scope |
This Standard establishes guidelines for the conduct of privacy impact assessments that are used for the protection of personally identifiable information (PII). It should be used by organizations that are establishing or operating programs or systems that involve the processing of PII, or that are making significant changes to existing programs or systems. This International Standard also provides guidance on privacy risk treatment options. Privacy Impact Assessments can be conducted at various stages in the life cycle of a programme or systems ranging from the prelaunch phase and decommissioning. In particular, it will provide a framework for privacy safeguarding and specific method for privacy impact assessment. It will be applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations and will be relevant to any staff involved in designing or implementing projects which will have an impact on privacy within an organization, including operating data processing systems and services and, where appropriate, external parties supporting such activities. This Standard describes privacy risk assessment as introduced by ISO/IEC 29100:2011. For the basic elements of the privacy framework and the privacy principles, reference is made to ISO/IEC 29100:2011. For principles and guidelines on risk management, reference is made to ISO 31000:2009. |
Documentation | |
Calendar | Published in June 2017 |
Comments |
29151 IS Code of Practice for PII Protection (also a ITU document - ITU-T X.1058)
Editor | Heung Youl Youm, Alan Shipman |
Scope |
This International Standard establishes commonly accepted control objectives, controls and guidelines for implementing controls, to meet the requirements identified by a risk and impact assessment related to the protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). In particular, this International Standard specifies guidelines based on ISO/IEC 27002, taking into consideration the regulatory requirements for processing PII which may be applicable within the context of an organization's information security risk environment(s). This International Standard is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public and private companies, government entities, and not-for-profit organizations, which process PII, as part of their information processing. |
Documentation | March 3rd presentation made by editor during an informal confcall with Dawn Jutla (OASIS) and Antonio Kung (PRIPARE): http://ipen.trialog.com/wiki/File:X.gpim-29151_oasis.pdf |
Calendar | Published in August 2017 |
Comments | Also an ITU reference (ITU-T X.gpim) |
29190 IS Privacy capability assessment model
Editor | Alan Shipman |
Scope |
This International Standard provides organizations with high-level guidance about how to assess their capability to manage privacy-related processes. In particular, it:
|
Documentation | Must be purchased. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45269 |
Calendar | |
Comments |
29191 IS Requirements for partially anonymous, partially unlinkable authentication
Editor |
Kazue Sako (NEC) |
Scope |
This International Standard defines requirements on relative anonymity with identity escrow based on the model of authentication and authorization using group signature techniques. This document provides guidance to the use of group signatures for data minimization and user convenience. This guideline is applicable in use cases where authentication or authorization is needed. It allows the users to control their anonymity within a group of registered users by choosing designated escrow agents. |
Documentation | Must be purchased. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45270 (preview available) |
Comments |
Published in December 2012 Under pre-review |
29184 IS Online privacy notices and consent
Editor |
Nat Sakimura, Srinivas Poorsala, Jan Schallaboeck |
Scope |
This document is a specification for the content and the structure of online privacy notices as well as the process of requesting consent to collect and process PII from a PII principal. This document is applicable to all situations, where a PII controller or any other entity processing PII interacts with PII principals in any online context. |
Documentation | |
Calendar | Further to Hamilton (April 2017)will go for 3rd draft |
Comments |
initiated in Jaipur (Oct 2015) Follows Study Period initiated in Kuching (May 2015) User friendly online privacy notice and consen |
Study Periods
Study periods are the instruments through which new items of standardisation will be introduced. They typically last 6 months (until next meeting), or 12 months (2 meetings) after which, a NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) can be made.
Privacy engineering framework (Started in April 2015. Completed in April 2016)
Leaders | Antonio Kung, Matthias Reinis |
Objective | Study the concept of privacy engineering and see whether new work items are needed |
Documentation | Slides presenting motivation for study period by Antonio Kung: http://ipen.trialog.com/wiki/File:PRIPARE_Proposal_Study_Period_Privacy_Engineering_Framework_2.pdf |
Timeline |
|
Privacy-Preserving Attribute-based Entity Authentication (Started in October 2015. Completed in April 2016)
Leader | Pascal Pailler, Nat Sakimura, Jaz Hoon Nah |
Objective | |
Documentation | |
Comments |
|
Editorial inconsistencies to 29100 (Started in April 2016. Completed in October 2016)
Leaders | Nat Sakimura, Mathias Reinis, Elaine Newton |
Objective |
Collecting errors and correcting inconsistencies |
Documentation | |
Comments |
|
Guidelines for privacy in Internet of Things (IoT) (Started in April 2016. Completed in April 2017)
Leaders | Heung Youl Youm, Srinivas Poorsala, Antonio Kung |
Objective |
|
Documentation |
|
Comments |
Initiated in Tampa (April 2016) Initial contribution in Abu Dhabi (October 2016) Conclusions in Hamilton (April 2017) led to the merging with Guidelines fot security in IoT (WG4). See new study period below on security and privacy for Internet of things. Discussion also led to a new study period "Framework of user-centric PII handling based on privacy preference management by users" |
Guidelines for security and privacy for Internet of Things (IoT) (Completed in November 2017)
Start/Duration | April 2017/6 months) |
Leaders | Eric Hibbard, Faud Khan, Tyson Macaulay, Srinivas Poorsala |
Objective | prepare the materials necessary to initiate an International Standard coming out of the SC 27 meeting in Berlin (Oct-2017) |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
Is an SC27/WG4 study periods involving WG4 and WG5. Study period is completed and new work item has been proposed (https://ipen.trialog.com/wiki/ISO#New_Work_Item_Proposal_Security_and_Privacy_for_the_Internet_of_Things). Kickoff expected in Wuhan in WG4 |
PII Protection considerations for smartphone app providers (Started in October 2015. Completed in April 2017)
Leader | Rahul Sharma, Natarajan Swaminathan, Johan Eksteen, Sai Pradeep Chilukuri |
Objective |
Study mobile application ecosystems from a privacy viewpoint Collect views of multiple stakeholders in the mobile applications space Collect mobile apps privacy guidelines issued by various agencies Collate a report on the findings Potentially provide a new work item proposal |
Documentation | |
Comments |
Initiated in Jaipur (October 2015) |
Privacy in smart cities (Started in October 2015. Completed)
Leaders | Antonio Kung, Sanjeev Chhabra, Udbhav Tiwari |
Objective |
Connect with multiple stakeholders in the smart city space Refer the existing work on smart cities Collate information, feedback, inputs from the stakeholders and draft the guidelines Potentially provide (a) new work item proposal(s) that can translate in guidelines |
Documentation | |
Comments |
Initiated in Jaipur (October 2015) Liaison to be established with ISO/IEC JTC1/SG1 (Smart cities) Presentation in Tampa (April 2016) of intermediate state
Presentation in Abu Dhabi (October 2016) of intermediate state
Presentation in Hamilton (April 2017) of intermediate state
Proposal for new work item in Berlin (Nov 2017) |
Code of practice solution for different types of PII (Started in October 2016, Completed)
Leaders | Mathias Reinis, Heung Youl Youm |
Objective |
Study ISO/IEC FDIS 29151 and ISO/IEC IS 27018 with the objective to find a solution that is applicable for different types of PII processors, especially compatible with the needs of a SME |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
Terminated due to lack of contributions |
Requirements and outline for ISO/IEC 29115 revision (Started in April 2017. 6 months)
Leaders | David Temoshok replacing Sal Francomacaro, Thomas Lenz, Patrick Curry, Andrew Hugues, Heung Youl Youm |
Objective | |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
|
David Temoshok replacing Sal Francomacaro, Thomas Lenz, Patrick Curry, Andrew Hugues, Heung Youl Youm |
Identify assurance framework (Started in April 2017. 12 months)
Leaders | Patrick Curry, Anthony Nadalin |
Objective | analyze the outcomes of ISO/IEC 29003 and related matters, then to determine the possible next steps towards developing an International Standard (or other mechanisms) for an Identity Assurance Framework. |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
|
Leaders | Christophe Stenuit, Joanne Knight |
Objective | Gather information in order to determine the viability of creating a standard providing guidance on the application of ISO 31000:2009 to assess identity-related risks |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
Framework of user-centric PII handling based on privacy preference management by users (Started in April 2017, 12 months)
Start/duration |
April 2017 / 12 months |
Leaders | Shinzaku Kiyomoto, Antonio Kung |
Objective | define frameworks of user-centric PII handling based on privacy preferences of users |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
Triggered by an initiative from ITU-T for such a framework applied to the IoT. See https://ipen.trialog.com/wiki/ITU_Activities#X.iotsec-3:.C2.A0Technical_framework_of_PII_.28Personally_Identifiable_Information.29_handling_system_in_IoT_environment In Berlin (November 2017), it was decided to consider 3 options
|
Concept of PII Deletion (Started in November 2017. 6 Months)
Leaders | Volker Hammer, Srinivas Poosarla, Eduard de Jong, Alan Shipman |
Objective | Stuty the potential internationalisation of national standard DIN 66398 "Guideline for development of a concept for data deletion with derivation of deletion periods for personal identifiable information" |
Documentation |
|
Comments |
|