Conflicting legal issues

• There are Conflicts
  • legal and legislative
    • law enforcement experience, particularly with regard to cybercrime - which has increased 300% since 2011.
    • the rights to privacy are not absolute
  • Other human rights
    • the potential need for standards to support a “balance of human rights”.
  • Legal changes
  • National security requirements
  • The problem of ever present sensors ( IoT etc)
• Conflicts can be avoided
  • Man examples are information security problems and not in it self privacy problems.
  • If we knowingly introduce backdoors into systems then we will have no security.
  • There are technologies to handle this type of situations in many cases
  • a subject can use lawyer, written statement, blockchain / smart contract, etc. whatever to reflect his / her will to implement the privacy rights – whether the implementation happens before or after the death
• SC27 WG5 should take a much wider look at this important issue, perhaps conducting a landscape review similar to the identity-related landscape review
• Privacy depends on strong governance and AAA (Authentication, Authorisation and Accountability) as any cyber professional will agree, which means privacy needs to be linked more closely to WG5’s authentication & IDM work. We need to consider the “How” of privacy more effectively, if we want our WG5 standards to be useful and widely adopted.